Bad Boss Pastors Who Drive You Nuts

Pastors can have two personas: one the congregation sees and one the staff sees. While the goal is to be the same person around everyone, it often does not play out. The reality is you act differently around staff you work with for hours on end each day, compared to other congregants you may see in passing once or twice a week. This dichotomy is not necessarily bad, but it can be when the pastor plays nice with the congregation while poorly leading the staff. Maltreating the staff places them in the awkward situation of not liking—or worse, detesting—the one leader the church loves.

While I believe most pastors truly want the best for their church and staff, some fall short of this level of integrity. So what makes a bad boss pastor? BusinessWeek had a great article on bad corporate bosses. I’ll tweak their thoughts for ministry leaders and shepherds. Here are some ways pastors can drive their staff nuts:

• Pretend you know better than everyone else, especially in areas that require specialized knowledge or technical expertise you don’t have.
• Don’t take notes and constantly check your phone at meetings. Better yet, do all the talking at “team” meetings.
• Make up your vision as you go. Create fires to accomplish this short-sightedness.
• Have a meeting. Throw ideas out like flinging spaghetti against a wall. Then don’t tell anyone what you thought stuck.
• Design a big, ongoing task for your team. Then never mention it again.
• Create a bunch of drama over something really small. Call an all-staff meeting to discuss it.
• Tell the staff one thing. Then tell the church the exact opposite from the pulpit at your primary worship services.
• Never discipline anyone, and try to be everyone’s best friend.
• Charm the congregation with your talent and eloquence. Bark orders at the staff.
• Listen to prominent and powerful church members more than your direct reports.
• Don’t tell anyone when you’ll be on vacation.
• Tell the congregation, “The buck stops with me.” Then flee from intra-staff conflict.
• Create rules for the staff. Make exceptions for yourself.
• Remove any hope for levity in the office. Stare sternly all the time and talk only about serious theological issues.
• Be more interested in denominational politics than in your local church.
• Never address the elephant in the room. Pretend it’s not there.
• Micromanage. Send a three-page email with detailed instructions to someone with whom you do not typically interact.
• Be threatened by others that are more talented than you. To deal with your insecurity, reassign these talented people to ministry areas outside of their talent.
• Be an amiable autocrat.
• Begin every meeting with a 30-minute devotional.

I know there are more. Any you want to add?

Statistical Snapshots Worth Noting

Stats are like still photographs—they reveal something about a specific place and time. One of the greatest sources for stats in the United States is the Statistical Abstract, published annually. It’s been around a long time (since 1878), and it is often used as a gauge for other national studies. Robert J. Samuelson recently reported on the just-released 2010 abstract. Here are some interesting tidbits about our culture as it stands today:

• 76% of Americans drive to work alone.  Only 10% carpool, and 5% use public transportation, while 3% percent walk to work. On average, Americans spend 25 minutes commuting each way (I once was above average here, now I’m glad to be well below average. Living in a small town has its advantages).
• Smoking has declined from 25% of adults in 1990 to 20%.
• Five-year survival rates for cancer are up. The percentage of people voting is also up—the 57% turnout in 2008 was the highest since 1968.
• Garbage per person has remained constant—it was 4.5 pounds per day in 1990, and it is now 4.6 pounds per day.
• Almost two-fifths of all U.S. births were to unmarried women, double the amount in 1980.
• The share of children under the federal poverty line has not changed in 1980.
• Nearly one-quarter of elementary and high school students are immigrants or have immigrant parents.

Tracking the Millennials

The Pew Research Center will begin a large project in 2010 involving the millennial generation (according to them, this generation represents those born between 1981 and 2000). It’s one to watch—I’m sure many of the results will reveal important insights into the next generation. Here’s a snippet explaining their research:

Generations, like people, have personalities. Their collective identities typically begin to reveal themselves when their oldest members move into their teens and twenties and begin to act upon their values, attitudes and worldviews.

America’s newest generation, the Millennials, is in the middle of this coming-of-age phase of its life cycle. Its oldest members are approaching age 30; its youngest are approaching adolescence. Who are they? How are they different from — and similar to — their parents? How is their moment in history shaping them? And how might they, in turn, reshape America in the decades ahead? The Pew Research Center will try to answer these questions through a yearlong series of original reports that explore the behaviors, values and opinions of today’s teens and twenty-somethings.

The researchers at Pew already have some data on this generation. From a big-picture perspective, here’s what they have found:

• They are the most ethnically and racially diverse cohort of youth in the nation’s history; a record low 59.8% are white.
• They are starting out as the most politically progressive age group in modern history.
• They are the least religiously observant youths since survey research began charting religious behavior.
• They are more inclined toward trust in institutions than were either of their two predecessor generations — Gen Xers (who are now ages 30 to 45) and Baby Boomers (now ages 46 to 64) when they were coming of age.

Ethnic diversity and progressive politics do not shock me, but more trust in institutions is a surprise. I do believe (as I’ve blogged before) that ethnic heterogeneity will become normative for this generation—that’s good thing, and churches should respond accordingly. But it’s tough to draw conclusions from these short points, so I’ll be curious to see what more data reveals about this generation. Any preliminary thoughts?

As a side note, I’m in favor of making 1980 the starting point for this generation. It’s easier to remember, and I was born in 1980—that way I can be in the same generation as my little brothers. Of course, I did listen to a lot of grunge growing up, so maybe I am more of a Gen Xer